OxideTalis/oxidetalis
OxideTalis/oxidetalis
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 10 Pull requests Projects 1 Releases Activity Actions

feat: Chat request implementation #14

Manually merged
awiteb merged 55 commits from awiteb/chat-request-and-response into master 2024-07-18 14:21:39 +02:00 AGit
Conversation 5 Commits 55 Files changed 34 +5 -5
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 39e7861917 - Show all commits

6
crates/oxidetalis/src/database/out_chat_requests.rs
View file

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ use crate::{errors::ServerResult, websocket::errors::WsError};
pub trait OutChatRequestsExt { pub trait OutChatRequestsExt {
/// Returns the outgoing chat request if the `user` have a sent chat request /// Returns the outgoing chat request if the `user` have a sent chat request
/// to the `recipient` /// to the `recipient`
async fn have_chat_request_to( async fn get_chat_request_to(
&self, &self,
requester: &UserModel, requester: &UserModel,
recipient: &PublicKey, recipient: &PublicKey,
awiteb marked this conversation as resolved
Amjad50 commented 2024-07-17 03:00:01 +02:00
Review
Copy link

should return true based on the name and description of the func

should return `true` based on the name and description of the func
Amjad50 commented 2024-07-18 09:46:34 +02:00
Review
Copy link

small nitpick (also applies to have_chat_request_to below)
I would name it get_chat_request_to, as have seems that it would be boolean

small nitpick (also applies to `have_chat_request_to` below) I would name it `get_chat_request_to`, as `have` seems that it would be boolean
👍 1
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ pub trait OutChatRequestsExt {
impl OutChatRequestsExt for DatabaseConnection { impl OutChatRequestsExt for DatabaseConnection {
#[logcall::logcall] #[logcall::logcall]
async fn have_chat_request_to( async fn get_chat_request_to(
&self, &self,
requester: &UserModel, requester: &UserModel,
recipient: &PublicKey, recipient: &PublicKey,
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ impl OutChatRequestsExt for DatabaseConnection {
requester: &UserModel, requester: &UserModel,
recipient: &PublicKey, recipient: &PublicKey,
) -> ServerResult<()> { ) -> ServerResult<()> {
if let Some(out_model) = self.have_chat_request_to(requester, recipient).await? { if let Some(out_model) = self.get_chat_request_to(requester, recipient).await? {
out_model.delete(self).await?; out_model.delete(self).await?;
} }
Ok(()) Ok(())

4
crates/oxidetalis/src/websocket/handlers/chat_request.rs
View file

@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ pub async fn handle_chat_request(
// FIXME: When change the entity public key to a PublicKey type, change this // FIXME: When change the entity public key to a PublicKey type, change this
let from_public_key = PublicKey::from_str(&from_user.public_key).expect("Is valid public key"); let from_public_key = PublicKey::from_str(&from_user.public_key).expect("Is valid public key");
if try_ws!(Some db.have_chat_request_to(from_user, to_public_key).await).is_some() { if try_ws!(Some db.get_chat_request_to(from_user, to_public_key).await).is_some() {
return Some(WsError::AlreadySendChatRequest.into()); return Some(WsError::AlreadySendChatRequest.into());
awiteb marked this conversation as resolved
Amjad50 commented 2024-07-17 02:55:46 +02:00
Review
Copy link

Maybe would be better to move this to WsError easier to manage errors
there are also others below this

Maybe would be better to move this to `WsError` easier to manage errors there are also others below this
awiteb commented 2024-07-17 09:13:50 +02:00
Review
Copy link

Right, this should be an error, not a message. I don't know how is this happened

Right, this should be an error, not a message. I don't know how is this happened
awiteb commented 2024-07-17 18:44:07 +02:00
Review
Copy link

I'll remove Message event it is actually useless. I don't know why I thought it was good.

I'll remove `Message` event it is actually useless. I don't know why I thought it was good.
awiteb commented 2024-07-17 18:47:46 +02:00
Review
Copy link

I don't know why I thought it was good.

Well, I remembered when I added it, it was a pain to add a new error (before ws_error macro) so I thought it was good for simple messages.

> I don't know why I thought it was good. Well, I remembered when I added it, it was a pain to add a new error (before `ws_error` macro) so I thought it was good for simple messages.
} }
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ pub async fn handle_chat_response(
PublicKey::from_str(&recipient_user.public_key).expect("Is valid public key"); PublicKey::from_str(&recipient_user.public_key).expect("Is valid public key");
if try_ws!(Some if try_ws!(Some
db.have_chat_request_to(&sender_user, &recipient_public_key) db.get_chat_request_to(&sender_user, &recipient_public_key)
.await .await
) )
.is_none() .is_none()